Differences between Ascribed and Achieved Status
Ascribed and achieved statuses have numerous differences and similarities. They each affect a person’s and a group’s roles both socially and industrially, and they may even affect the characteristics of a person and the public’s perception of them.
Ascribed Status:
1. Assigned by society without individual effort.
2. Often based on age, sex, race, caste, kinship, and tradition.
3. More stable and rigid.
4. Linked to customs, traditions, and cultural factors.
5. Provides emotional satisfaction by aligning with internal aspects of the personality.
6. May co-relate with the role but unpredictably.
7. Highly valued in traditional societies.
Achieved Status:
1. Attained through personal effort, abilities, and accomplishments.
2. Based on qualities, capacities, and abilities.
3. Less stable, changeable.
4. Less influenced by customs and traditions, more by competition.
5. Reflects personal achievements and characteristics.
6. Role and authority are predictable, based on reason and evaluations.
7. Emphasized in modern, open societies.
Ascribed status and achieved status represent two distinct categories of social positions. Both statuses can complement each other, with the potential to mitigate the limitations associated with each type. Understanding the differences between these statuses is essential for analyzing social dynamics and hierarchies within societies.
0 Comments